From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 30 16:22:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3989E16A4ED
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:22:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19F843D5C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:22:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2UGMpUg014131
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from xdivac02@localhost)
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2UGMpHa014130;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:22:51 +0200
From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com>
Message-ID: <20050330162251.GA13437@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References: <b37cb097050329102222136cd9@mail.gmail.com>
	<200503291335.33385.jkim@niksun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200503291335.33385.jkim@niksun.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Dan Cojocar <dan.cojocar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Interrupt storm
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:22:56 -0000

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:35:33PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:22 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I noticed the following interrupt storm in my dmesg:
> >
> > Interrupt storm detected on "irq11: rl1"; throttling interrupt
> > source Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: rl0"; throttling
> > interrupt source
> >
> > Here is my vmstat -i:
> > interrupt                          total       rate
> > irq0: clk                         128600        199
> > irq1: atkbd0                        2499          3
> > irq4: sio0                             2          0
> > irq5: rl0                         128901        200
> > irq8: rtc                          82294        127
> > irq11: rl1                        128902        200
> > irq12: psm0                        16152         25
> > irq14: ata0                        12600         19
> > irq15: ata1                           71          0
> > Total                             500021        776
> >
> > and here is my dmesg:
> > http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt
> >
> > I have options DEVICE_POLLING and options HZ=200, i have tested
> > with greater HZ values like 1000, and without DEVICE_POLLING  but i
> > have the same storm.
> 
> Try this:
> 
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503161154.04555.jkim

as this points to my posts...

my problem is not the interrupt storm, but that I dont have assigned irq for
keyboard (which makes it slow I think).

and this is clear regression because in 5.3R it worked ;(

where should I look (in sources) what changed? I am not very skilled with this
lowlevel stuff but I am able and willing to try to hunt this down.

thnx for reply

roman