From owner-freebsd-security Sun Jul 19 21:48:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA21515 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:48:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp1000.lariat.org@[206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA21509 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:48:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA09638; Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:47:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199807200447.WAA09638@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:47:38 -0600 To: John Dowdal From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: The 99,999-bug question: Why can you execute from the stack? Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , dg@root.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <199807200140.TAA06705@lariat.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:30 AM 7/20/98 -0400, John Dowdal wrote: >As a seasoned assembly language programmer, you should understand the >subject of "backup" quite well. And so I do. But when you're caught between backups, and don't discover the break-in right away, it's not that straightforward to restore the system. And restoring it also re-opens security holes. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message