Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:26:11 +0000
From:      Shivansh Rai <shivansh@freebsd.org>
To:        hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>, Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc:        "freebsd-transport@freebsd.org" <freebsd-transport@freebsd.org>, "Jonathan T. Looney" <jtl@freebsd.org>, Sam Kumar <samkumar99@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: TCP_HAVERCVDFIN
Message-ID:  <CAF%2Bp1Ht_1hSbtFV%2BiFpUNC_GMgFG=dYKs9s63VRmCrUKofv7nQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF%2Bp1Ht=ES4n6OOS-EKNjCfjqGetMVQk0jtY_-vtK==Nc3pUSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGtMfeBWzGAmt2Kq9bejon54xiz%2BHBOEjho1z=NZe_0fqG5Z2g@mail.gmail.com> <D2B685A4.4F28E%jlooney@juniper.net> <CAHWkzRSvofzDoH-W6kkhr_JexjbWQkfvN5sX-Ws5NPM-_XhYDQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160817235158.GE68615@strugglingcoder.info> <CAF%2Bp1Ht=ES4n6OOS-EKNjCfjqGetMVQk0jtY_-vtK==Nc3pUSQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I deeply apologize for my mistake. The tests which I have made do not test
the intended behavior, as I misunderstood the issue which was being
discussed. Hiren has pointed out how to go about testing the issue, so I
will update the tests soon.

Thank you.
Regards,
Shivansh Rai

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM Shivansh Rai <shivanshrai84@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Hiren,
>
> I have updated the test suite *[1]* with the relevant tests *[2]* that
> were pointed out in D7475 *[3]*. I hope they can be used for the
> verification.
> Please let me know in case of any discrepancies.
>
> [1] : https://github.com/shivrai/TCP-IP-Regression-TestSuite
> [2] :
> https://github.com/shivrai/TCP-IP-Regression-TestSuite/tree/master/fin
> [3] : https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7475
>
> Thank you.
> With Best Regards,
> Shivansh Rai
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:22 AM hiren panchasara <
> hiren@strugglingcoder.info> wrote:
>
>> Resurrecting this thread.
>>
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7475
>>
>> I like this new behavior and it is being tested at NF and LLNW without
>> any known problems.
>>
>> Any strong objection against it other than it _may_ break something? :-)
>> I don't see us getting a conformance test suite anytime soon so I
>> suggest we go ahead with this fix without any MFC and see how it goes?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hiren
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Shivansh Rai
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF%2Bp1Ht_1hSbtFV%2BiFpUNC_GMgFG=dYKs9s63VRmCrUKofv7nQ>