Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:58:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234020] www/firefox: Do we have prior written permission to patch and use official branding? Message-ID: <bug-234020-21738-Zfxx504KNX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234020-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-234020-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234020 --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- Probably[1] but Mozilla themselves don't provide FreeBSD binaries. Many port patches are due to lack of manpower to clean up the cruft and upstream the rest. Port defaults tend to lag behind e.g., no Mozilla API key, no telemet= ry yet[2] and no crash reporting. Is this not acceptable? [1] https://people.freebsd.org/~ahze/firefox_thunderbird-approved.txt [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1352981#c4 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234020-21738-Zfxx504KNX>