From owner-freebsd-small Mon Jan 24 23:53:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD98A14DC9 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 23:53:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.9.2/8.8.7) with UUCP id HAA99315; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:53:18 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:40:20 GMT X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20000125103358.U2643@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi>; from trossi@co.jyu.fi on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:20:24PM +0200 <3888D5CF.329989@achtung.com> <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:40:19 +0000 To: Greg Lehey From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd Cc: Timo Rossi , small@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:33 +0800 25/1/00, Greg Lehey wrote: >[...] >Unfortunately, the current PicoBSD system is oriented towards >floppies. This has the great disadvantage, at least in the current >implementation, that each crunched executable repeats the library >contents. For a flash memory system it would make more sense to have >a single executable... Um, that's what the current PicoBSD system does? >...which might be larger than a single floppy. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message