From owner-cvs-include  Mon Mar 31 04:58:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-include>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA16273
          for cvs-include-outgoing; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 04:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.dialix.com [192.203.228.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA16264;
          Mon, 31 Mar 1997 04:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1])
          by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA12853;
          Mon, 31 Mar 1997 20:58:08 +0800 (WST)
Message-Id: <199703311258.UAA12853@spinner.DIALix.COM>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include unistd.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 31 Mar 1997 04:52:53 PST."
             <199703311252.EAA15958@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 20:58:07 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM>
Sender: owner-cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Peter Wemm wrote:
> peter       97/03/31 04:52:52
> 
>   Modified:    include   unistd.h
>   Log:
>   Declare lchown()..

BTW, can anybody tell me the difference between the first list of 
prototypes and the second?  It almost looks like the first are syscalls 
and the second are library functions, but it's far from that now.  Or are 
the first set "standards based" functions, while the second set are 
"other"?

Cheers,
-Peter