From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 18:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8890216B97D for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 18:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from smtp05.retemail.es (smtp05.auna.com [62.81.186.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B164843D5F for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 18:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from dander.retena.com ([212.21.232.99]) by smtp05.retemail.es (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20060517184710.XQFX1144.smtp05.retemail.es@dander.retena.com> for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:47:10 +0200 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060517202814.0315b950@pop3.retena.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:48:14 +0200 To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org From: Eduardo In-Reply-To: <9f7850090605151445w46233d5ak35226e3b73b046aa@mail.gmail.co m> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060514091549.01e2a4d8@pop3.retena.com> <9f7850090605151445w46233d5ak35226e3b73b046aa@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Auth-Info: Auth:LOGIN IP:[212.21.232.99] Login:nec556@retena.com Fecha:Wed, 17 May 2006 20:47:10 +0200 Subject: Re: Embedded FreeBSD Presentation... X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:47:40 -0000 At 23:45 15/05/2006, you wrote: >On 5/14/06, Eduardo wrote: > >>Is this really possible:? Sorry for be a bit unoptimist, but in the >>embeded space the o.s.must follow some rules that freebsd (nor linux, >>*bsd, windows, etc..) can't: > >The word "embedded" has come to include a wide range of small devices >that are nearly as powerful as desktop systems were ten years ago. >I've built cell phone operating systems around Linux, and currently >have one of these http://www.embeddedarm.com/epc/ts7200-spec-h.html >running NetBSD. I agree with you, the word embedded includes too many types of devices, i was thinking in our 405 powerpc, where we run QNX RTOS(i prefer to run FreeBSD, but don't know how to do the port). As we are going to upgrade processors, an embedded freebsd will be an option for us. >It would be great to see a FreeBSD embedded system that covered arm devices. And ppc ;) Perhaps if i post this FreeBSD to embedded task at Power.org we can get some voluntarees. Any problem about that? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Antivirus Warning: User Detected. Keep Away the computer or YOU will be eliminated.