From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 15 12:54:52 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5A16A412
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.smartterra.de [195.225.132.203])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEE243D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:54:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203])
	by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 21979-04; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.alpha-tierchen.de (port-212-202-42-252.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.42.252])
	by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF2C16022E;
	Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2])
	by smtp.alpha-tierchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7775288A;
	Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:54:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <450AA29D.9000700@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:54:53 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>
References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net>	<200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org>
	<d6895b7d0609140844re8260fel953ddfeff0a9edf8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6895b7d0609140844re8260fel953ddfeff0a9edf8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.smartterra.de
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:54:52 -0000

Jamie Bowden schrieb:
> On 9/9/06, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote:
> 
>> > Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right?
> 
> 
>>         No. STABLE means STABLE API.
> 
> 
>>         If you want stable code you run releases.  Between releases
>>         stable can become unstable.  Think of stable as permanent
>>         BETA code.  Changes have passed the first level of testing
>>         in current which is permanent ALPHA code.
> 
> 
> No, this is what it means now. [...]

Why do you say "No" if you mean "Yes, but in former times ..."?

Björn