From owner-freebsd-current  Mon May 26 13:30:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA09516
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA09497
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA14117; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:26:58 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199705262026.NAA14117@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: NEW FEATURE.. RFC will commit unless....
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 13:26:58 -0700 (MST)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19970526211637.JM43194@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at May 26, 97 09:16:37 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> As Adam David wrote:
> 
> > Not only unlinking, but on any shrinking truncate.
> 
> Appendonly files are already there.

He wants to purge (pattern wipe using DOD hysterisis effective
pattern) on all block reclamation, not only on block reclamation
as a result of unlink.

He is not asking for no-unlink to make the files non-shrinkable.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.