From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 18 17:20:24 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151B16A401
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54A643D6E
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3IHKJKG065001
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:19 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3IHKJPE064999;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:19 GMT
Message-Id: <200604181720.k3IHKJPE064999@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Christopher Chin <cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Christopher Chin <cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:24 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/95956; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christopher Chin <cchin@ack.Berkeley.EDU>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/95956: 128-bit
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)

 On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 (19:50 -0000), Mark Linimon wrote:
 > 
 > Synopsis: 128-bit
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: linimon
 > State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 17 19:49:11 UTC 2006
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > The 108-bit key is understood to be the correct behavior.
 
 
 Hmmm...  turns out that a better answer would have been
 for me to (re-)read the 6-0 Release Notes...
 particularly section 2.2.2.2. Network Interface Support.
 
 Apparently: "Note in particular that WEP now requires
 the wlan_wep module to be loaded (or compiled) into the
 kernel."
 
 All fine and good... but I'd be surprised if others
 don't trip on this as well when 6.x gets more usage.
 
 Oh...  Sorry about the lame subject line.  I hit the 
 submit button before going back and "fixing" the Subject.
 
 Thanks,
   - Christopher
 
 ======================