From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 20 12:44:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA10515 for current-outgoing; Sun, 20 Oct 1996 12:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peedub.gj.org (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA10506 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 1996 12:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peedub.gj.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.gj.org (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA02558 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 1996 21:43:32 GMT Message-Id: <199610202143.VAA02558@peedub.gj.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN code removal, final warning. Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Oct 1996 17:03:18 +0200." <199610201503.RAA00568@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 21:43:32 +0000 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk sos@freebsd.org writes: >In reply to Wolfram Schneider who wrote: >> >> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> >As we have discussed earlier, the ISDN code currently in the >> >FreeBSD source tree doesn't really cut it, so this is the final >> >warning before we remove it. >> > >> >ISDN users are kindly urged to get in touch with the "bisdn" gang. >> >> Does we import bisdn into the source tree? > >I'd say no for the moment, but when they get their stuff in a more >usefull state (and clear up the copyright probs or whatever it is) >we should consider it again. exactly. >As an ISDN user I have the same reservations as Poul-Henning, I'm >not sure ISDN belongs in the kernel... well, *some* of it has to be there (namely, the drivers for the cards). Of course, one can argue that the LAP & HDLC stuff doesn't have to all be in the kernel. iijppp is a good illustration of that. Things might be simpler if we had an ISDN socket layer. --- Gary Jennejohn Home - Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de Work - gjennejohn@frt.dec.com