Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:02:27 +0100 From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r307080 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg Message-ID: <50996CD3.6020906@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=0xBS4Gi31HOKQQfJDDmY6vU3gmQoGV_8=rpaBHgvVYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211061632.qA6GWfvF002597@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=0xBS4Gi31HOKQQfJDDmY6vU3gmQoGV_8=rpaBHgvVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-11-06 20:16, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 11:32, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Feature safe: yes
>
> Given that every single port relies on pkg, is this really feature safe?
Feature safe yes since the package is not recorded as dependency.
However make use the package time stamps to decide rebuilding a packages, if one is newer ...
My local workaround implemented as tinderbox hook protects me from rebuilding all ports.
$> touch -t 197001010101.00 ${PB}/packages/${BUILD}/All/pkg-1*.txz
Maybe something similar could be implemented in the port.
--
olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50996CD3.6020906>