From owner-cvs-all Fri Dec 18 06:42:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA15325 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 06:42:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA15318; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 06:42:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA22348; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 15:41:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Dag-Erling C. Sm\xf8rgrav" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libfetch Makefile common.c common.h ftp.c http.c References: <199812181432.GAA02112@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 18 Dec 1998 15:41:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Dag-Erling C. Sm\xf8rgrav"'s message of "Fri, 18 Dec 1998 06:32:49 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk "Dag-Erling C. Sm\xf8rgrav" writes: > Rename fetchConnect to _fetch_connect since it's internal. though if I understand the standard correctly, all the _fetch_xxx should be renamed to either __fetch_xxx or _Fetch_xxx since their scope is wider than file scope. Any language lawyers care to comment? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message