From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 7 09:18:41 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E5816A419 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jan.Lentfer@web.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D9413C447 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jan.Lentfer@web.de) Received: from [195.4.92.16] (helo=6.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J0ZLz-00083L-4t; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:18:39 +0100 Received: from p54b0e966.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.176.233.102]:61829 helo=epia.lan.net) by 6.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID jan.lentfer@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.68 #1) id 1J0ZLz-00079H-0k; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:18:39 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epia.lan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F918B4AB; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:18:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lan.net Received: from epia.lan.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.lan.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s5BwcVYX0yNx; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (epia.lan.net [10.94.76.3]) by epia.lan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD758A048; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from 195.145.31.136 ([195.145.31.136]) by neslonek.homeunix.org (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:18:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20071207101817.xcvz0wdi68cscwkg@neslonek.homeunix.org> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:18:17 +0100 From: Jan Lentfer To: JoaoBR References: <4756BAD3.4060905@web.de> <95938867@bb.ipt.ru> <200712060051.26294.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200712060051.26294.joao@matik.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5) / FreeBSD-6.2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:19:25 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems Building 7.0-Beta3 with -Os X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:18:41 -0000 Zitat von JoaoBR : > FYI, I am certainly very performance and not compatibility oriented > > whatever, my question, probably disturbing question, is what any available > make.conf option could offer any measurable or significant advantage for a > system which only has 1Gig and as like you say a "VIA C7 system"? What > miracle you are waiting for when tweaking make.conf with parms others than > specifics to you ownly and lownly CPU? I'd say this is basically a question what you expect your system to =20 do. As this is a fanless Mini-ITX system with a 1Gig C7 CPU standing =20 in my living room and being idle 90% of the time, I expect to have low =20 noise and low power consumption while this system delivers acceptable =20 performance for my personal use (PostgreSQL, postfix/cyrus imapd with =20 amavis, apache, bacula, etc...). Also this system has an integrated =20 padlock chip which makes it ideal as an VPN gateway running OpenVPN. Still making the system 10% "less lame" by using some optimization =20 levels in compilation at no extra cost is something I certainly won't =20 leave aside :-). On the other hand, why you want to optimzie the hell out of a 4-way =20 8-Gig Operton server or the like, for normal services you want feel =20 too much difference here, because it is fast as hell anyway. So, to sum it up, it's a point of view an expectations you have - no =20 general answer possible. Regards, Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.