From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 13 17:21:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8F937B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com
	(h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.31.45.197])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E809043FAF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rodrigc@crodrigues.org)
Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com (localhost.crodrigues.org
	[127.0.0.1])h8E0Lc5m005029;	Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:21:38 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from rodrigc@h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Received: (from rodrigc@localhost)h8E0LbC0005028;
	Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>
To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@compar.com>
Message-ID: <20030914002137.GA5004@crodrigues.org>
References: <20030913233905.GA3834@crodrigues.org>
	<003901c361f5$317db6b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <003901c361f5$317db6b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: M_NOTIFICATION in <sys/mbuf.h>?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:21:47 -0000
X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:21:37 -0400
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:21:47 -0000

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 07:47:01PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > KAME guys have it here:
> > http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/freebsd5/sys/sys/mbuf.h?rev=1.5
> 
> The KAME snapshot of our source tree is 3 months out of date.  The most
> recent version of mbuf.h is here:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h?rev=1.122&content-type=text/plain
> 
> We already have 0x8000 assigned, and the only free flags value is 0x4000 -- 
> but it conflicts with other private usages in the kernel (as per the CVS
> comments.)
> 
> Does SCTP-KAME really need a special flag value?


OK, I am looking at the FreeBSD-4 source tree for KAME and found this:


http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/freebsd4/sys/sys/mbuf.h.diff?r1=1.18&r2=1.19

CVS comment: "sctp for freebsd4 - again, not ready for daily use yet"

It looks like M_NOTIFICATION was added specifically for SCTP.
I'll try to find out more about this.

Thanks.

-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://crodrigues.org
rodrigc@crodrigues.org