Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:47:36 +0100
From:      Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS.
Message-ID:  <200411141947.39918.benlutz@datacomm.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net>
References:  <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1985503.u7cWbsJ02b
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

This change is most annoying. I'm not questioning the decision, I'm sure=20
that a lot of people who know the ports system much better than I do have=20
discussed it in-depth, but I would like to state that this change was=20
done in an ungraceful and disruptive manner.

I noticed that something was different when my portupgrade suddenly took=20
ages. There being *nothing* about this in UPGRADING didn't exactly help=20
either. Next time, can't you please give an advance warning (a HEADSUP=20
mail to the mailing lists is enough, but please do it a few days before=20
you change things). Also, an UPGRADING entry is a must. And if would have=20
been extra considerate if you had waited with this change until that new=20
index generator tool was in the ports. Some of the machines I admin are=20
very weak, and make index is just not practical. Granted, make fetchindex=20
works, but how is that an improvement over having the INDEX in CVS.

As for an always out of date INDEX - I'd rather have an INDEX file that I=20
know only gets updated every few weeks, but which works and which I don't=20
have to worry about.

Well, I guess giving people some incentive to think about how to improve=20
the ports system is a good thing. Would have been nice though if that=20
incentive had been a carrot instead of a pitch fork though.

Benjamin

--nextPart1985503.u7cWbsJ02b
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBl6hLgShs4qbRdeQRAuWdAJ9HhzsNNftSMc+XmgODXqJunMn7mQCfZ18m
lXstxw/gbrKzkNrbHt2W6qQ=
=uXTB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1985503.u7cWbsJ02b--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411141947.39918.benlutz>