From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 2 19:40:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DBA106566C for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3758FC15 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA2Je4wJ083230 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA2Je4mn083229; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200911021940.nA2Je4mn083229@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Felippe de Meirelles Motta Cc: Subject: Re: ports/82634: heimdal port conflict with base heimdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Felippe de Meirelles Motta List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/82634; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Felippe de Meirelles Motta To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, fandino@ng.fadesa.es Cc: Subject: Re: ports/82634: heimdal port conflict with base heimdal Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:37:10 -0200 Hi fandino, I'm sure that we can use messages echoed to instruct the heimdal users to rebuild using NO_KERBEROS on /etc/make.conf, it's seems to be more sense to all. What do you think about ? -- lippe@FreeBSD.org