Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:42:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280435] security/strongswan: Kernel_pfkey plugin's sadb_ext_type_names ENUM is out of date with the latest pfkeyv2.h in the base Message-ID: <bug-280435-7788-k5gGtMXe96@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280435-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280435-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280435 kwf@nanoteq.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|security/strongswan: |security/strongswan: |Kernel_pfkey plugin's |Kernel_pfkey plugin's |sadb_ext_type_names ENUM |sadb_ext_type_names ENUM is |only caters for Linux |out of date with the latest | |pfkeyv2.h in the base --- Comment #1 from kwf@nanoteq.com --- Initial assessment of the bug was incorrect and the patch won't fix anythin= g. The pfkeyv2.h in the base was updated to cater for hardware offloading and = the=20 SADB_EXT_MAX updated to 31 while the ENUM in the kernel_pfkey_ipsec.c still uses the original list. Fix should be to add the additional definitions to the list with compile-ti= me flags (ifdefs) as to whether it should be enabled. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280435-7788-k5gGtMXe96>