Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:26:50 -0700
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>
Cc:        "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
Message-ID:  <8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <F9A66A1B-4C3A-4E7A-AF8C-88B3C93D33A1@ultra-secure.de>
References:  <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org> <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3> <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org> <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de> <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org> <F9A66A1B-4C3A-4E7A-AF8C-88B3C93D33A1@ultra-secure.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2013-04-24, at 14:18 , Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote:

> 
> Am 24.04.2013 um 23:02 schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>:
> 
>> 
>> On 2013-04-24, at 12:48 , Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> In the NFS mount options.
>>> I've re-done my tests and it still seems to be a problem. 
>> 
>> 'k, just to clarify … your tests are with the Broadcom chipset(s)?   I have an Intel card on order, so will run tests against that as soon as it gets here to see  how it changes …
>> 
> 
> 
> No, with the intel card then.
> Even then it was slow.
> 
> 
> 
>> Just curious, but what are you running for tests?   I noticed it visually, but other then  using something like iozone21, not sure what is useful for coming up with a benchmark …
> 
> 
> I've just ran something like
> dd if=/dev/zero of=bla bs=1000000 count=1000
> 
> on the nfsmount on the client.
> 

Here is what I'm seeing with the Broadcom card:

IOZONE performance measurements:
        108561574 bytes/second for writing the file
        95311340 bytes/second for reading the file


That is using 'ozone 1024' for a 1G file … and no mount / kernel settings …

The problem isn't with the single file read / write though … the problem is when starting up an app server like jboss … my "reference server" is an old 32bit, 2 CPU + HT server with local drives … start up takes, from jboss start to deploy: 

				JBoss AS 7.1.1.Final "Brontes" started in 87916ms

now, I do acknowledge that this is with local drives, so will always be faster the NFS drives … but … 

HP Proliant Gen8, 64bit, 16G of RAM, Oodles of CPU:
	FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 24 CPUs
	FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 6 core(s) x 2 SMT threads
Brand new HP Procurve 2910al-24G … brand new 3xxx series NetApp running 8.1.2 … and everything pretty much idle (non production yet), and:

				JBoss AS 7.1.1.Final "Brontes" started in 310249ms


So, over 4x slower?

Can you send me what your mount options are in /etc/fstab?  I'd like to try that out and compare against the two above … and I do have the Intel card on the way, so see if that makes a difference …  







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3>