From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 7 1: 9:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F286814EDB; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 01:09:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA27756; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:08:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Brad Knowles Cc: Mike Smith , Tom , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Pascal Hofstee , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates in latest build? References: <199909061829.LAA20185@dingo.cdrom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 07 Sep 1999 10:08:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: Brad Knowles's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 1999 20:47:39 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brad Knowles writes: > I think I'm beginning to understand the attitude problem that > Linux advocates have accused the FreeBSD camp of. You're the one with an attitude problem. Like Mike said, you have no idea, not even a trace of an inkling, about how long and how hard this matter was discussed before bpf was enabled in GENERIC. Go read the archives, take a cold shower, and come back when you're prepared to listen and not just preach. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message