From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:59:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F7116A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:59:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8875943D46 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so200025wri for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:59:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=sdjH+tZpOc4+1yQqEQCsl/guGVfczmhS7lbJmOywleTV75OEM7qgE5kHRekhVJRlyTQ7FfAHZL2qCP1IWBvltDtrBT092m9l/4K4c9aM9Jr6JYFySnVf/oUE1sNUptZdldPOip1NA04jBk6n8jkUQFZ58ODflTqjwv1N43GeMiA= Received: by 10.54.44.14 with SMTP id r14mr617916wrr; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.14.15 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:59:22 +1000 From: Robert Backhaus To: Didier Wiroth In-Reply-To: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <99f113a61084.4252ff36@etat.lu> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vesa 1024x768 mode in future version? to the freebsd community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Robert Backhaus List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:59:26 -0000 On Apr 6, 2005 5:12 AM, Didier Wiroth wrote: > > I was wondering if the patches (see link below) have any chances to make their ways into a future release version or may be in the ports collection? I agree that it would make life more enjoyable for some people, but the console is increasingly a fail-safe debugging/configuring interface, as more people use X for any work. Yes, I would use it myself in places, especially laptops, but I would not like it there if it possibly made the console less stable. It would want to be very well tested. I'd slate it for 6.Stable, when it occours.