From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Mar 4 15:30:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0330937B719 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:30:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 14Zhxa-0007GX-01; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 00:30:42 +0100 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f24NSBL02700 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 00:28:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: ksh93 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <97uj2b$2k3$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <20010303091958.A68223@spawn.nectar.com> <200103031650.f23GoWS12086@cwsys.cwsent.com> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > I can see a problem with replacing ash with ksh. [...] I don't agree, but I don't want to discuss that level of detail yet. > If we are going to import ksh93 into the source tree, which I think is > a good thing, Considering the AT&T license, is this even an option? The actual license text is impenetrable for me, but here are some excerpts from : ... | 5. Can I modify the source and distribute it to someone else? | | Yes, but you need to package the modifications separately, usually as a | patch file. ... | 7. Can I give the original source package to someone else? | | You can, provided that the person you give it to has agreed to the | license. The person does not have to physically sign the license, but | they must affirmatively agree to the same license agreement. We have | enclosed this agreement with the package. ... There is also a termination clause. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message