From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 8 22:02:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC85116A41B; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A291B13C467; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 365281CC3D; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:02:15 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: Remko Lodder Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:02:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200708081620.l78GK69W018680@freefall.freebsd.org> <20070808175414.GC51816@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <20070808175414.GC51816@elvandar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708081502.14940.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/114667: [umass] UMASS device error log problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:02:30 -0000 On Wednesday 08 August 2007 10:54:14 Remko Lodder wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:20:06PM +0000, David Southwell wrote: > > The following reply was made to PR kern/114667; it has been noted by > > GNATS. > > > > From: David Southwell > > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, > > david@vizion2000.net > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: kern/114667: [umass] UMASS device error log problem > > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:27:59 -0700 > > > > Hi > > > > Just wondered if anyone might have the time to look at this -- it really > > is a nuisance. > > > > Thanks > > Hello David, > > I just checked the PR itself and I personally do not think this is > something we should handle though, the messages get in the logfile because > you ask for information on a 'heavily removable' device, it mostly has > multiple ports and the device has no knowledge to see what 'port' is being > used [if at all used]. > > That said; this is my private opinion, others might ofcourse disagree with > me, please feel free to continue to discuss this, but in addittion I also > think this is not worth a PR ticket. > > Cheers > remko Sorry but I and a number of others who have complained about the same problem do agree it is worth a PR. basically we seem to have an uncontrollable worthless message generator. If you can tell me how to stop the messages for this device it would make a PR unnecessary but as things stand none seems to be able to answer the question "How do we stop the messages?" David