From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 28 10:48:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA28674 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 10:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.inch.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA28668 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA10314; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 13:57:07 GMT Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 13:57:06 +0000 (GMT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Nathan Dorfman cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Majordomo Port In-Reply-To: <199706281715.NAA11184@limbo.senate.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm not sure what's causing your error, but I'm sure it's easily fixed... One thing you should check before you fire it up is whether it's been patched for a little bug that was posted to Bugtraq last week. There's a patch available; you should be able to find it on the archives at www.geek-girl.com... Charles On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Nathan Dorfman wrote: > Hi! I downloaded the majordomo port from ftp.FreeBSD.org in the ports-2.2.1 > directory (I'm running 2.2.1-RELEASE). I did a make install. It downloaded > the source and patched it and all, and this is the error I'm getting: > > ===> Configuring for majordomo-1.94.1 > majordom user using uid 54 > majordom user using gid 54 > chpass: corrupted entry > > Majordomo user not found - aborting! > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > > I tried adding this entry: > majordom:*:54:54:Majordomo pseudo-user:/usr/local/majordomo:/nonexistent > > to both /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd, with the exact same results. > Changing the user name in these files to majordomo doesn't help either. Has > anyone had any luck compiling Majordomo on a 2.2.1 system? Should I run > listserv instead, in which case, what has this port done already that I need > to undo :-) >