Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:47:51 +0530 From: "Debarshi Ray" <debarshi.ray@gmail.com> To: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD networking and TCP/IP list <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: reading routing table Message-ID: <3170f42f0809020017k643180efte155a5b5701a40cf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48BCE4AA.6050807@elischer.org> References: <3170f42f0809010507q6c37a9d5q19649bc261d7656d@mail.gmail.com> <48BBE7B2.4050409@FreeBSD.org> <48BCE4AA.6050807@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> unfortunatly netstat -rn uses /dev/kmem Yes. I also found that FreeBSD's route(8) implementation does not have an equivalent of 'netstat -r'. NetBSD and GNU/Linux implementations have such an option. Any reason for this? Is it because you did not want to muck with /dev/kmem in route(8) and wanted it to work with PF_ROUTE only? I have not yet gone through NetBSD's route(8) code though. Happy hacking, Debarshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3170f42f0809020017k643180efte155a5b5701a40cf>