Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:29:17 +1000 From: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggestion for dns/bind910 pkg-message Message-ID: <5355B7DD.9040503@heuristicsystems.com.au> In-Reply-To: <0805B38FA994050714A31A49@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <18B4A4CB-42D2-4577-A3F4-43EEE430CEB3@distal.com> <0805B38FA994050714A31A49@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/04/2014 1:41 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Hi, > > +--On 20 avril 2014 11:18:35 -0400 Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> > wrote: > | > | The pkg-message in dns/bind910 (actually, bind9*) includes text about > | setting up a chroot environment, and configuring rdns. At the end, it > | says: > | > |> The /etc/rc.d/named script in the base will do both for you. > | > | In FreeBSD 10, this is not true. There is no /etc/rc.d/named script. > | I think this message should be adjusted so that it doesn't display > | misinformation on a FreeBSD 10 system (perhaps just by changing it's > | wording, as I don't know that there's a way in ports to do conditional > | messages, but). > > Yes, I know, but before removing it, I'm still pondering on adding back the > chroot support to BIND on FreeBSD >= 10. > Mathieu, Would it be possible to also reconsider adding an etc/rc.d/named script into the port. It would certainly help those that build their world WITHOUT_BIND=yes in /etc/src.conf, because they know that they're going to use the port version, in my case no a 9.2 Stable. Copying /usr/src/etc/rc.d/named makes the packages distribution process feel a little incomplete. Regards, Dewayne.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5355B7DD.9040503>