From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 25 08:47:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4194916A401 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F28713C478 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E041A4D80; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:47:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 478FF51446; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:47:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:47:37 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Petri Helenius Message-ID: <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:47:39 -0000 On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:41:17AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:00:32AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote: > > > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>This shows the graph of MySQL transactions/second performed by a > >>>multi-threaded client workload against a local MySQL database with > >>>varying numbers of client threads, with identically configured FreeBSD > >>>and Linux systems on the same machine. > >>> > >>> > >>How does that compare to 6.2-RELEASE performance? > >> > > > >Much better. Fixing filedesc locking was key. > > > > > If there is extra cycles on the same hardware, a performance comparison > graph would be great. See the links in my posting ;) Kris