From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct 12 14:37:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA18322
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA18316
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA05280; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
cc: hoek@hwcn.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:30:31 -0000."
             <199710122130.OAA22722@usr05.primenet.com> 
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:36:29 -0700
Message-ID: <5276.876692189@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Yes, but the boot messsage source is apparently the only one that's
> annoying enough to actually motivate anyone to actually change code.

Depends on your definition, I guess.  Annoying enough to change code
where "change code" = "do something significant about it?"  No.
Annoying enough to change just enough code to shut it up?  Yes,
sure, I agree. :-)

					Jordan