From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 9 03:55:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA07181 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 03:55:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.comkey.com.au (alpha.comkey.com.au [203.9.152.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA07135 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 03:55:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjb@comkey.com.au) Received: (qmail 16812 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Feb 1999 10:37:22 -0000 Message-ID: <19990209103722.16811.qmail@alpha.comkey.com.au> X-Posted-By: GBA-Post 1.04 06-Feb-1999 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5A91 6942 8CEA 9DAB B95B C249 1CE1 493B 2B5A CE30 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 20:37:21 +1000 From: Greg Black To: David Kelly Cc: "Kevin T. Likes" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: exmh 2.0.2 and wish8.0 eating memory on 3.0 References: <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net> In-reply-to: <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net> of Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:07:15 CST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Since you mention it, just looked at what wish8.0 was doing on my system > right now with exmh (3.0-stable, mostly elf). Eek! 10952k RES and SIZE > of 11528k according to top. Going to have to break down and print the > mutt manual and learn something new. Maybe procmail too. Might be better to follow up with the tcl/tk people and see why this is happening -- it's not at all normal for various versions of exmh and should not really be happening. I've got one exmh that's been running since last year and only uses 4 MB and another one that's been going a few days on FreeBSD that's only up to 5 MB, and I'd call that normal. > Possibly what is the final straw to break exmh's back is that sendmail > no longer accepts messages from my exmh unless I have a live DNS > connection. Good old: This sounds like a faulty sendmail config. I'm not going to suggest a fix because I stopped using sendmail years ago and it has evolved quite a bit since then. I'm sure somebody else will be able to help. > nmh-1.0 was announced the past week. Not sure if its in ports yet. But > maybe replacing mh-6.8.4 with nmh will fix my mh/sendmail problem. Setting up sendmail right would be far more likely to do that. Standard mh-6.8.4 works just fine. -- Greg Black To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message