From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jan 16 11:15:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269FCB0FF7 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F1D17E5 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cT5GN-000NQ5-Nh; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:47 +0300 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:47 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anybody looked at Cisco VPP? Message-ID: <20170116111547.GC78888@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20170116.115948.74712958.sthaug@nethelp.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170116.115948.74712958.sthaug@nethelp.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:15:51 -0000 On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:59:48AM +0100, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > Has anybody looked at Cisco VPP? > > http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/a-bigger-helping-of-internet-please > > It would be interesting to see comparisons with netmap. Unrelated. netmap is a compute-efficient network I/O, like DPDK. VPP work over this layer: "Combined with a compute-efficient network I/O (e.g., DPDK), VPP enables very efficient and high performing design".