From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 04:33:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4EA16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E943D60 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:33:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS500C7L3K93B70@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:38:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0IS5003663GTU4C1@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:36:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:33:49 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-id: <20051227053349.7a9b321f.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <43B04F5B.3040701@rogers.com> Subject: Re: No APM yet for AMD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:33:51 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:50:00 -0500 Francisco Reyes wrote: > That's ACPI... notice I typed "APCI". That was not a typo. And you are not talking about 'apic' here? If you can disable the apic, you might have a semi-working acpi on your machine. My amd64 workstation ran that way for several months until that particular problem was fixed. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway