From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 05:02:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD3516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A965243D5A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:02:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1069867nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ma6HQIAanlFNIrzZxQCLLXwXwNS0eFcEOiE7BFrUTcdK+sGkRDXtJjuInGWnB3h84HMTzoFX++p6JAQ7PA9kZU5/7HZHo1xo4+VAhkk5XazkfA2YAnjqRIA9GyyzmZvoE6p6uV6pDGYrcJ2/u7ukh0EbfpbVcCOzTh1NLdsyBKU= Received: by 10.64.21.10 with SMTP id 10mr1361856qbu; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.210.8 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0512252102g3faa7e35l6490343431448a78@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 From: Jack Vogel To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0512220941y61c9b5acs8053e6df8a96a1e4@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com> <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em bad performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:02:07 -0000 On 12/25/05, Scott Long wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) > > > > Jack > > Isn't 'half duplex' meaningless in the gigabit link protocol? > > Scott Yes, but it was meant as a joke, hence the smiley :)