From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 18 14:50:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE8D6A for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abgupta@microsoft.com) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0154.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E252F1A for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.144) by BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:08 +0000 Received: from BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.85]) by BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.151]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.005; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:08 +0000 From: "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" To: Karl Pielorz , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues? Thread-Topic: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues? Thread-Index: AQHOtGyZ0FLUQhf3cEaI3XfbmUZ1CpnLi5tFgAAHCYCAAADwlQ== Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: <9cabc6fbba754dd3aa357943ef82db22@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <18D121A056145C32F0501114@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <155969fa70a34e41a84649bf3cb81c21@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <4787C47D82401721B4C53B49@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4787C47D82401721B4C53B49@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [71.227.189.27] x-forefront-prvs: 09730BD177 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51704005)(55674002)(189002)(43784003)(24454002)(164054003)(377454003)(199002)(52604005)(77096001)(56816003)(76796001)(74502001)(76786001)(76576001)(63696002)(81342001)(74316001)(54356001)(74366001)(81542001)(74662001)(51856001)(56776001)(47446002)(79102001)(31966008)(77982001)(59766001)(54316002)(83072001)(76482001)(80022001)(69226001)(47736001)(74706001)(46102001)(74876001)(47976001)(49866001)(33646001)(81816001)(50986001)(81686001)(19580395003)(53806001)(66066001)(65816001)(80976001)(19580405001)(4396001)(83322001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB210; H:BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:71.227.189.27; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:50:22 -0000 Thanks again Karl! Yes, it should work. My understanding is that the failov= er should be agnostic to the guest OS but there could be some integration c= omponent that we might have missed. So it would be good to get to the botto= m of this.=0A= =0A= Regards,=0A= =0A= Abhishek=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Karl Pielorz =0A= Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:45 AM=0A= To: Abhishek Gupta (LIS); freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org=0A= Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issue= s?=0A= =0A= --On 18 September 2013 14:23 +0000 "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)"=0A= wrote:=0A= =0A= > Hi Karl,=0A= >=0A= > Thanks for reporting the issue. Please give us some time to investigate= =0A= > and get back to you on this. In the meantime I wanted to ask if setting= =0A= > up a Hyper-V replica for the FreeBSD VM and then a manual failover=0A= > reproduces the same symptoms? Please let me know.=0A= =0A= Hi,=0A= =0A= Manual fail-over appears to work OK - in order, I tested:=0A= =0A= - Live migration from one node to the other, and back again (worked)=0A= =0A= - Stopping the cluster service on one of the nodes (i.e. from Failover=0A= Cluster Manager) - this showed the VM moving from the node that was=0A= stopped, over to the other node (again worked).=0A= =0A= - Pulling the power on the active node hosting both VM's (i.e. Windows=0A= guest, and FreeBSD guest) - this showed the remaining node trying to bring= =0A= up the VM's (of which Windows came up OK, and FreeBSD got corrupted).=0A= =0A= =0A= I've had to stop now as the guy here looking after the Synology kit on the= =0A= test network is applying a firmware update (this is apparently for some=0A= appletalk issue or something).=0A= =0A= I'll re-run the test after this has been done - if it still fails, I'll=0A= come back with a 'how to reproduce' type report (and I'll obviously let you= =0A= know if we can't reproduce it again!).=0A= =0A= At least I know it 'should' work now :)=0A= =0A= Thanks,=0A= =0A= -Karl=0A= =0A=