From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 3 16:10:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [216.254.138.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B10C37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mike@localhost) by espresso.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g53N8Ie88061; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:08:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:08:18 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: Bruce Evans Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing wait union Message-ID: <20020603190818.E16166@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:22:14AM +1000 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bruce Evans writes: > On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > Does anyone have any objections to removing the deprecated 4.2/4.3BSD > > wait union in ? It's been deprecating since Rev 1.1 and > > there are only a few consumers in the base system. Attached are two > > patches, one to removing it from and the other to remove > > its consumers. Changes to lpd(8) sent directly to its maintainer. > > I think the only potential problem is use of the compatibility cruft > in deprecware outside the base system. It would be useful to have a > quick way to determine how many ports a change in a standard header > affects. Kris is going to do a test run of the ports build for me. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message