Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:40:24 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Subject: Re: nve timeout (and down) regression? Message-ID: <200603251340.24234.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200603231540.33339.joao@matik.com.br> References: <20060323182910.1190845041@ptavv.es.net> <200603231540.33339.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=E5=9C=A8 Friday 24 March 2006 02:40=EF=BC=8CJoaoBR =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF= =BC=9A > > The other patch cited in the message has never been made: > > diff -u -r1.7.2.4 if_nve.c > > --- if_nve.c 9 Oct 2005 04:18:17 -0000 1.7.2.4 > > +++ if_nve.c 27 Oct 2005 09:58:45 -0000 > > @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ > > > > DEBUGOUT(NVE_DEBUG_INIT, "nve: nve_init_rings - entry\n"); > > > > - sc->cur_rx =3D sc->cur_tx =3D sc->pending_rxs =3D sc->pending_t= xs =3D 0; > > + sc->cur_rx =3D sc->cur_tx =3D sc->pending_rxs =3D 0; >=20 >=20 > and I did this part and my NIC is running, as I said still lot of collisi= ons=20 > caused by it but it is running >=20 >=20 > Jo=C3=A3o >=20 This change causes my NIC to not work anymore, though I still saw timeout without this change, I think this varies from hardware=20 revision to revision, unpredictable at all. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603251340.24234.davidxu>