From owner-freebsd-java Wed Sep 9 10:53:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18459 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 10:53:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hq.freegate.com (freegate.com [208.226.86.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA18454 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 10:53:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sbb@freegate.com) Received: (qmail+freegate 7849 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 1998 17:53:38 -0000 Received: from ws18-n0.hq.freegate.com (HELO sbb) (208.226.86.146) by hq.freegate.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 1998 17:53:38 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980909105902.00979b70@mailhost.hq.freegate.com> X-Sender: sbb@mailhost.hq.freegate.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 10:59:02 -0700 To: alk@pobox.com, rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk From: Steve Byrne Subject: Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible? Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <13814.46288.737653.240366@compound.east> References: <13813.27934.606377.693358@compound.east> <199809082154.WAA00626@fdy2.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:07 PM 9/9/98 -0500, Tony Kimball wrote: > > >Please do share your findings! The other obvious possibility is >using the gjc stuff; but that is GPL, and is likely to leak memory >(not being designed as part of a long-lived jvm) -- unless you >add boehm gc! Uh...how can you conclude that? The compilation technology has little to do with the runtime memory management model. Cygnus has posted papers about their GC approach, both on their web site, and in the most recent issue of Dr. Dobbs. I suggest you read that before assuming that memory leakage of allocated storage is connected with the generation of machine code. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message