From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Feb  1 13:22: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.telestream.com (mail.telestream.com [205.238.4.5])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B3B3EF5
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  1 Feb 2000 13:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (keith@localhost)
	by mail.telestream.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28101;
	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:08:08 -0800
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:08:08 -0800 (PST)
From: <keith@mail.telestream.com>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@hades.hell.gr>
Cc: Joseph Scott <joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu>,
	Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>,
	freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: release 3.5?
In-Reply-To: <20000201211454.C1678@hades.hell.gr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002011306320.27943-100000@mail.telestream.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm curious as to what makes it go up to 4.0 instead of 
3.5, 3.6 3.7  etc etc  before going into 4.x.
Is there any reasoning behind it or is it just up to developers to decide
upon a version number?

Keith


=================================
I hearby change the name
of RedHat to RedSplat.

Keith W.
At the helm <for better or worse>
=================================





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message