From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 22 23:55:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1206A912 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lifanov.com (mail.lifanov.com [206.125.175.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03912642 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from app.lifanov.com (chat.lifanov.com [206.125.175.13]) by mail.lifanov.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41BFD1A6CC8 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:55:51 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:55:51 -0500 From: Nikolai Lifanov To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: systematic issue with =?UTF-8?Q?PYDISTUTILS=5FAUTOPLIST?= In-Reply-To: References: <5280F298.2020604@marino.st> <528DF2F8.1010702@marino.st> Message-ID: <2a4724a76ef8e97f9fe30732de52f0f3@mail.lifanov.com> X-Sender: lifanov@mail.lifanov.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:55:52 -0000 On 2013-11-22 16:46, Nicola Vitale wrote: > Hi, > >> [2013/11/22 William Grzybowski ] >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Nicola Vitale >> wrote: >>> If so, in my opinion the cause may be this change to bsd.python.mk: >>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=322046 >> >> In my opinion its not really a cause, how else would you do that? We >> are dealing with packages, I don't see another way to install the >> packages if not manually poking with easy-install.pth. > > Yes, of course. Or we can use easy_install command again... > >> Sure, but the only way around that I see is manually creating the >> easy-install.pth, or figure out a way to tel setuptools to, > > In fact, and why did you not add that file? Obviously we could create > a simple port as a run dependency of setuptools, that installs only > that file with a minimal content, so not having to worry about it when > you update setuptools. Wouldn't it be better to package it as an extra file *with* setuptools? If it's only used by setuptools, creating a separate dummy port seems odd. Just add it to files/ or something. - Nikolai Lifanov