From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 14:37:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EE316A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:37:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internal.mail.demon.net (internal.mail.demon.net [193.195.224.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9982043D39 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:37:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: from singsing.eng.demon.net (singsing.eng.demon.net [194.217.90.11]) by internal.mail.demon.net with ESMTP id i7AEe4416888; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:40:05 GMT Received: from singsing.eng.demon.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7AEbMtY026006; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:37:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: (from michaelb@localhost) by singsing.eng.demon.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i7AEbL1Y026005; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:37:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) X-Authentication-Warning: singsing.eng.demon.net: michaelb set sender to mike@urgle.com using -f From: Mike Bristow To: Simon Dick In-Reply-To: <1092148372.632.4.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> References: <1092044482.20927.35.camel@singsing.eng.demon.net> <1092143030.54231.0.camel@simon.lcn.biz> <1092147286.632.0.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> <4118DB22.8060202@samsco.org> <1092148372.632.4.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: (none) Message-Id: <1092148641.25849.14.camel@singsing.eng.demon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:37:21 +0100 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: mutex vr0 not owned at ...if_vr.c:571 when doing ifconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:37:30 -0000 On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 15:32, Simon Dick wrote: > > So backing out rev 1.93 _and_ applying the patch in the PR makes > > everything work? If so then I'll look into this today. Ta. I don't know why my box paniced with 1.92; I suspect it's partially due to the fact that my network is running ipv6 as well as ipv4, but I'm guessing. > Yes, that's exactly what I found, thanks Mike Thanks for looking at my patch :) -- Mike Bristow - http://www.urgle.com/~mike/ - mike@urgle.com What do you give an injured lemon? So he could make a clean getaway