Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 May 2018 08:46:36 +0200
From:      Per olof Ljungmark <peo@nethead.se>
To:        "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <freebsd@gushi.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Subject:   Re: www/joomla3 port installs from GitHub, why?
Message-ID:  <7a90b3d3-9a97-0cb1-61ec-fb790b2ce9f5@nethead.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1805201628190.2459@prime.gushi.org>
References:  <4a3253e3-50b5-8c4c-68f3-f90ce8e2257e@nethead.se> <5B01B272.5060105@grosbein.net> <FC6F394A-C8BB-4126-9D3E-BE9B50EAEA92@lerctr.org> <0586cce0-6f94-30ad-1685-263a6f74efef@nethead.se> <5B01C935.1090007@grosbein.net> <ecd200c3-2035-a983-a4dd-0cbfe1e1dc0a@nethead.se> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1805201628190.2459@prime.gushi.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/21/18 01:49, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2018, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> 
>> On 05/20/18 21:15, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>> 21.05.2018 2:02, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> 
>> OK, I'll try to explain a bit more.
>>
>> Firstly, this port is PHP code and needs no compilation, so they are
>> both source files. NO_BUILD=       yes
>>
>> www/wordpress is a similar port, correctly implemented in the ports
>> tree, if you install it from ports you will have identical result to
>> downloading from wordpress.org and extract it manually.
>>
>> The difference as stated above, is that the FreeBSD port includes the
>> files for *development* of Joomla, the official download has all the
>> files necessay to build a website based on Joomla.
>>
>> It may be that there are people using FreeBSD to develop Joomla, then of
>> course this port are for them, although a more proper naming would be
>> joomla3-devel or somesuch.
> 
> joomla-devel would kind of imply that you're installing the "devel"
> version of it, not that it includes the devel LIBS.  This seems to be a
> standard wording for ports (see locate /usr/ports/ | grep \\\-devel |
> grep pkg-descr | xargs cat )
> 
> What makes more sense to me is that the Dev files would be part of a
> non-default option -- whether that's included with the normal .tar.gz or
> requires the github copy, I can't say.

That sounds as a good solution - both are available at Github - will try
to suggest a patch.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7a90b3d3-9a97-0cb1-61ec-fb790b2ce9f5>