From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 25 05:45:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA18782
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 05:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (hq.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA18769
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 05:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.7.5/8.6.5) id SAA19190; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 18:43:18 +0600 (ESD)
From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>
Message-Id: <199610251243.SAA19190@hq.icb.chel.su>
Subject: Re: DOS emulation (was Re: Networking in PCEMU (1/2))
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 18:43:17 +0600 (ESD)
Cc: erich@lodgenet.com, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199610250230.MAA16152@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 25, 96 12:00:04 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> What we _need_ is for the kernel vm86 stuff to happen so that DOScmd
> can go ahead; this is basically predicated on Sean having the time to
> do it, as none of the other x86 gurus seemed interested in helping us
> deal with the problem we hit last time.  The emulation code in DOScmd
> is actually pretty good, and having brutally cleaned it, it's _much_
> easier to read and work on than the Linux dosemu code.
> 
> Once _that_ works, we can do some _serious_ DOS emulation.

Do you speak about porting the code from BSDI ? I remember
someone wrote in -hackers that he got it nearly working.
Or did I mixed it with something else in my mind ?

-SB