From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jul 7 22:26: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from sumatra.americantv.com (sumatra.americantv.com [208.139.222.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02F614DFC for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 22:26:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jlemon@americantv.com) Received: from right.PCS (right.PCS [148.105.10.31]) by sumatra.americantv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA14036; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 00:26:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by right.PCS (8.6.13/8.6.4) id AAA28561; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 00:26:01 -0500 Message-ID: <19990708002601.33591@right.PCS> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 00:26:01 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Mohit Aron Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: paper on improving webserver performance References: <19990707231308.40142@right.PCS> <199907080511.AAA28180@cs.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.61.1 In-Reply-To: <199907080511.AAA28180@cs.rice.edu>; from Mohit Aron on Jul 07, 1999 at 12:11:33AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jul 07, 1999 at 12:11:33AM -0500, Mohit Aron wrote: > > Possibly that might be the reason why my timing wheel is performing worse. > In any case, a 5% difference isn't much to worry about - the earlier drafts of > my paper also had a full description of the timing wheel. We threw that out > because of space limitations and since the list implementation was simple > and promising enough. In any case, I'd like to know how your timing wheel > performs vs my list based implementation (the latter is really easy to > implement). Perhaps you can compare the two. Sure, if you want to send me the code, I can see how they compare with the particular application that I'm using. (a web proxy server). -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message