From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 03:30:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39B716A403 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4209443CA6 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1081A3C1E for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:30:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA27C51361; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 22:30:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 22:30:17 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061204033017.GA52486@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061204022115.GA7142@lordcow.org> <20061204023011.GA51889@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061204023644.GA7226@lordcow.org> <20061204030400.GA52211@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061204032653.GA8203@lordcow.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061204032653.GA8203@lordcow.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:30:37 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:26:53AM +0200, gareth wrote: > On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)... >=20 > sure, the original question then since we've moved lists: >=20 > On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote: > > hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: > > > > # portversion -l "<" > > gnupg < > > p5-Compress-Zlib < > > p5-IO-Socket-SSL < > > p5-PathTools < > > portupgrade < > > rsync < > > spamass-milter < > > # portupgrade -aF >=20 >=20 > > What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions? >=20 > # portversion -l '<' -v > gnupg-1.4.5_1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2) > p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42 < needs updating (port has 2.001) > p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01 < needs updating (port has 1.02) > p5-PathTools-3.23 < needs updating (port has 3.24) > portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2 < needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2) > rsync-2.6.8_2 < needs updating (port has 2.6.9) > spamass-milter-0.3.1_1 < needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3) Those versions are all a couple of weeks stale, so I guess your ports tree really isn't up-to-date. Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFc5ZJWry0BWjoQKURAiSzAJ4tdTpl0jz33qj8pzCnPp4Ou4eMrQCgsSqA CBe/+DwPfK7RAZfp18Aaef4= =NBBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--