From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 11 17:48:28 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8232106566B;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:48:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com)
Received: from smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net (smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net
	[208.70.128.56])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B668FC0C;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailanyone.net
	by smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net with esmtpa (MailAnyone extSMTP
	jalmberg@identry.com)
	id 1MmAEQ-0008Bf-3q; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:48:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4AAA8D60.4000300@identry.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:48:16 -0400
From: John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0.0 (Macintosh/2009090801)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
References: <4AA9BCF0.6040003@identry.com>
	<h8dek8$tsa$1@ger.gmane.org>	<4AAA577A.8070103@identry.com>
	<h8dq3n$4pi$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <h8dq3n$4pi$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: reducing size of apache instances
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:48:28 -0000

> PHP is incredibly buggy and will in all probability break Apache if you
> try running it in threaded mode.

That doesn't sound so good.

As a sanity check... I've been studying these processes all morning. 
When I use 'top', the column RES shows the amount of RAM used for the 
process, correct? This is the value I'd like to get down.

Okay, well after a morning studying and observing, and thanks to 
suggestions from you all, I think I understand enough to start turning 
modules off.

Crossing fingers...

-- John