From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 20 7:20:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from vax1.baker.ie (VAX1.baker.IE [194.125.50.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3823B1506D for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cillian@baker.ie) Received: from baker.ie ([194.125.50.55]) by vax1.baker.ie with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:21:11 +0100 Message-ID: <37BD6DEC.179D7D5@baker.ie> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:02:05 +0100 From: Cillian Sharkey X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Change to /sys/net/if.c & /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c References: <26745.935158306@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:55:45 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote: > > > Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?) > > about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps > > we should wait until this has been decided.. ? > > This has nothing to do with the boot messages, though, surely? Sorry, I meant kernel messages in general (of which boot messages are a part of) Basically the discussion was suggesting different levels of verbosity for the kernel as a whole, one level would be the bare mininum (ie. errors, warnings etc.) another level might include informational and another might include debug etc.. Of course as the saying goes: "Nothing works in practice like a good theory." :P Cillian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message