From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 21 15:39:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1036F9BFBC3 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00E41D14; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: by pawq9 with SMTP id q9so55100158paw.3; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:39:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=jLslOqy05eP+dGUyzcuDJ9NE7yAUaOmRgVBBL+s3/r4=; b=sl1qtaUSsvkk4VktnNJRoxOWz8QEA4iYNr/nnxI1jdEusxgsC1TFxMsmqcpGgFwjnx BLil0shBMfx9H2gso1NcMxtKZAEXQZyTuHkkyrd1wcwR3NN2rm/qHs2SzoEjnCNFrMfE v9OgIRvVCzumjfcJB3K6GRR2D0WGV1wobfBRlrSVnWiO4l2XudoFqW/4/4xsK2moHXtp F7vHIwzf4c0Ru6uiQF/F99s/2jmX5lcictJ8OUR+2fFP7e8TeC9lj3OSj2mu2A2SkVyw TZM694A35px5ebUsPL+6niIIUnCEZhWL9kz7dAIkc1FS8qN2ihOSPTEjHV78aWQfitos Dbwg== X-Received: by 10.68.200.72 with SMTP id jq8mr18109659pbc.91.1440171543350; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heidegger.home (pool-98-119-79-32.lsanca.fios.verizon.net. [98.119.79.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r1sm8255669pdm.31.2015.08.21.08.39.02 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Mellanox 40Gb support From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: <55D7431C.4010502@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:39:00 -0700 Cc: "K. Macy" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1D67A5BA-D9A1-4729-A6F2-4A3241C13EF9@gmail.com> References: <39463A45-148F-431E-9C75-87952B27033A@gmail.com> <55D741FE.3090009@freebsd.org> <55D7431C.4010502@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:39:04 -0000 Ah I see. Well I=92m primitive and use whats in current. I had attempted this before using there standard EN driver and failed = massively. So I=92ll be using there OFED driver. - aurf "Janitorial Services" On Aug 21, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/21/15 11:24 PM, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Well, this is all in a test env of course, but I=92m planning to use = head. >>=20 >> What are your thoughts? > My curiosity was as to whether you hook this into the current NFS or = whether=20 > it's so different that it's almost a new implementation..? >=20 >> =20 >> - aurf >>=20 >> "Janitorial Services" >>=20 >> On Aug 21, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Julian Elischer = wrote: >>=20 >>> On 8/21/15 10:29 PM, aurfalien wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks very much for the response. >>>>=20 >>>> Well, I=92m implementing NFSoRDMA and as a best practices, Mellanox = suggested I use the very latest drivers. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>> really? >>> On FreeBSD? >>> Is this a fresh implementation of NFS or using the NFS in head? >>>=20 >>=20 >=20