From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 31 1:29:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E1B37B417 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16Kyn1-0008ea-00; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:31:27 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Matthew Dillon Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ntfs and sendfile problem (corrupted data) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:19:51 PST." <200112302019.fBUKJpZ16855@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:31:27 +0200 Message-ID: <33267.1009791087@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:19:51 PST, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Well, we have a problem here. smbfs is allowing VOBJBUF to be set > on its vnodes. This creates a backing VM object that smbfs never > uses and makes sendfile() believe that it can do UIO_NOCOPY uio's on > smbfs vnodes. Thought you might be worth copying. :-) Thanks for the analysis, Matt. I've forwarded your message to bp and fjoe in case they're not watching freebsd-current closely (or just skipped the thread because it looked ntfs-specific). Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message