From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:11:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD6116A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9243FF5; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from melange.errno.com (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h85NBl17065099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:11:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 16:11:47 -0700 From: Sam Leffler To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <1031494330.1062778306@melange.errno.com> In-Reply-To: <200309052309.h85N9M2P069083@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200309052309.h85N9M2P069083@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys interrupt.h taskqueue.h src/sys/kern subr_taskqueue.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:11:54 -0000 > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/sys interrupt.h taskqueue.h > sys/kern subr_taskqueue.c > Log: > "fast swi" taskqueue support. This is a taskqueue that uses spinlocks > making it useful for dispatching swi tasks from fast interrupt handlers. This code is not used by anything currently in the system so might be kept under an #ifdef. If it's usefulness isn't decided soon it should probably be removed. I'm committing it now so other folks can use it to evaluate the merits of Iithread-based ISR's vs. fast ISR's. Sam