From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 10 16: 5:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.runet.edu (peloton.runet.edu [137.45.96.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50F614A14; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 16:05:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.runet.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28202; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:05:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:05:23 -0500 (EST) From: Brett Taylor To: Joseph Scott Cc: erich@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gimp-1.1.11 In-Reply-To: <38517B79.F6B2163E@owp.csus.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Joseph Scott wrote: > One thing I've noticed is that the version of the gimp in the ports > collection is the developers version instead of the stable version. > Is there any chance of having two gimp ports, one for stable and one > for developers? I'm hoping that most/all of the problems that I'm > running into on gimp won't be in the stable version. I've found, that at least in my use, that the developer's version _is_ more stable than the stable version. YMMV. Brett ***************************************************** Dr. Brett Taylor brett@peloton.runet.edu * Dept of Chem and Physics * Curie 39A (540) 831-6147 * Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics * Walker 234 (540) 831-5410 * ***************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message