From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 17:20:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE8416A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:20:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6731143D2D for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:20:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i58HIdbI009622; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:18:39 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:19:30 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406081019.30500.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Peter Risdon cc: roberthuff@rcn.com cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:20:01 -0000 On Tuesday 08 June 2004 09:36 am, Bill Moran wrote: > Peter Risdon wrote: > > Robert Huff wrote: > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch > > >> sees many commits that are likely to be problematic. > > > > > > In general, no. > > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > QED > > I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... > > What's "QED"? I remember seeing that at the end of mathematical proofs at the University where the professor was too lazy to finish their documentation. It was much more fitting here :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html